View Full Version : Ilford and the Amateur Photographer
clarehm
23rd October 2009, 11:37 AM
Has anyone read the Amateur Photographer today???
:mob:
Tom Kershaw
23rd October 2009, 02:10 PM
The stolen cameras or Harman Technology?
Tom
Mike O'Pray
23rd October 2009, 05:01 PM
No. Give me or maybe it's us a flavour of what was written. Thanks
Mike
Bob
23rd October 2009, 05:14 PM
If you mean the substance of this (http://www.film-and-darkroom-user.org.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=1602) thread, then no - I have not bought AP for several years now.
It appears that Brierley was misquoted and he actually said that amateur darkrooms were "much reduced" in volume, not "gone". Harman/Ilford are reportedly not happy with AP...
Keith Tapscott.
24th October 2009, 09:56 AM
If you mean the substance of this (http://www.film-and-darkroom-user.org.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=1602) thread, then no - I have not bought AP for several years now.
It appears that Brierley was misquoted and he actually said that amateur darkrooms were "much reduced" in volume, not "gone". Harman/Ilford are reportedly not happy with AP...
....and it should be made known that Stephen Brierley was misquoted.
A lot of darkroom enthusiast who use Ilford materials and have read that AP quote, are probably concerned about the future of Ilford darkroom products.
Dave miller
19th November 2009, 08:20 AM
I've just seen last weeks edition of Amateur Photography (14/11) headed "Darkroom backlash over Ilford claim" in which several traders, including two of our sponsors, Clare who started this thread, and Martin Reed give them a bit of a savaging for getting their facts wrong. Well done to you both. We're on the up apparently; but then we all knew that! ;)
B&W Neil
19th November 2009, 08:38 AM
Good news - long may it continue :-)
Neil.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.