Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free:   AG Photographic   The Imaging Warehouse   Process Supplies   RH Designs   Second-hand Darkroom Supplies  

Notices


  ***   Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks   ***

  Home · Search · Register  
Please note: The posting of negative scans is prohibited in FADU, except within the Help or Discussion Galleries when requesting help with negative faults or the like.   Click for details.
Max image size: 1400 pixels per side and a maximum of 1MB in total file size

Home » FADU Galleries » Exchange Galleries » Print Exchange Gallery » November 2020 Round 123 Photo Options
fadu_print_exchange_123c.jpg
fadu_print_exchange_123b.jpg
fadu_print_exchange_123a.jpg

Previous image

print exchange round 123
Click on image to view larger image

Previous image


Photo Details
MartyNL



Friend

Registered: September 2010
Location: based in The Netherlands
Posts: 3,341
users gallery
Nunnery Walks, Eden Valley.
· Date: Sun, 29, November, 2020 · Views: 2339
· Filesize: 79.6kb, 332.0kb · Dimensions: 1400 x 1400 ·
Additional Info
Keywords: print exchange round 123
Film make, size & rating:: kodak t-max 100
Film developer & temp:: kodak t-max developer
Lens Focal Length, aperture: mamiya c220
Tripod used Y or N:: y

Author
Thread  
Terry S
Friend

Registered: December 2011
Location: Southend on Sea, Essex, England, UK
Posts: 3,796
Mon, 30, November, 2020 1:22pm

As Mike has said with the previous print, your prints for this round seem very, VERY darkly printed Marty, even by my standards.


Are these good representations of the actual prints? I ask as I know that scans are quite often not a very good representation of the prints themselves.


It would be really interesting to see them in real life.


Just reading the recipients comments, there is no mention of their darkness. So, can you help Marty?


Terry S
This user is online
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery  
MartyNL

Friend

Registered: September 2010
Location: based in The Netherlands
Posts: 3,341
Mon, 30, November, 2020 5:21pm

Hi Terry, unfortunately the scans have turned out more "chalk and soot" than the original prints. As you know, a photograph can't truly be appreciated via a screen.

------------------------------
MartyNL “Reaching a creative state of mind thru positive action is considered preferable to waiting for inspiration.” - Minor White, 1950
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery  
alexmuir
Friend

Registered: January 2010
Location: Glasgow, Scotland.
Posts: 2,668
Tue, 1, December, 2020 8:35pm

I know from what has been said that this scan is not the best representation of the original. You can tell, however, that there is a real richness to this print. I like the way there is no sky visible, and that the light is concentrated near the centre of the frame. I’m sure the original must look superb.
Alex.
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery  


Photo Sharing Gallery by PhotoPost
Copyright © 2007 All Enthusiast, Inc.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.