Author
|
|
Terry S
Friend
Registered: December 2011 Location: Southend on Sea, Essex, England, UK Posts: 3,796
|
Mon, 30, November, 2020 1:22pm
|
|
|
As Mike has said with the previous print, your prints for this round seem very, VERY darkly printed Marty, even by my standards.
Are these good representations of the actual prints? I ask as I know that scans are quite often not a very good representation of the prints themselves.
It would be really interesting to see them in real life.
Just reading the recipients comments, there is no mention of their darkness. So, can you help Marty?
Terry S
|
|
|
|
MartyNL
Friend
Registered: September 2010 Location: based in The Netherlands Posts: 3,341
|
Mon, 30, November, 2020 5:21pm
|
|
|
Hi Terry, unfortunately the scans have turned out more "chalk and soot" than the original prints. As you know, a photograph can't truly be appreciated via a screen.
------------------------------ MartyNL
“Reaching a creative state of mind thru positive action
is considered preferable to waiting for inspiration.” - Minor White, 1950
|
|
|
|
alexmuir
Friend
Registered: January 2010 Location: Glasgow, Scotland. Posts: 2,668
|
Tue, 1, December, 2020 8:35pm
|
|
|
I know from what has been said that this scan is not the best representation of the original. You can tell, however, that there is a real richness to this print. I like the way there is no sky visible, and that the light is concentrated near the centre of the frame. I’m sure the original must look superb.
Alex.
|
|
|
|
|