Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free:   AG Photographic   The Imaging Warehouse   Process Supplies   RH Designs   Second-hand Darkroom Supplies  

Notices


  ***   Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks   ***

  Home · Search · Register  
Please note: The posting of negative scans is prohibited in FADU, except within the Help or Discussion Galleries when requesting help with negative faults or the like.   Click for details.
Max image size: 1400 pixels per side and a maximum of 1MB in total file size

Home » FADU Galleries » Exchange Galleries » Print Exchange Gallery » July 2021 Round 131 Photo Options
131_travel_camera.jpg
PE_R131_2_of_2_Lith_print_of_Westcliff_seafront.JPG
PE_R131_1_of_2_Priory_Park_water_fountain_fish.JPG
fadu132.jpg
Round_131.jpg
more

Previous image   Slide Show   Next image

PE_R131_1_of_2_Priory_Park_water_fountain_fish
(1/2) Water fountain fish, Priory Park, Southend
Click on image to view smaller image

Previous image   Slide Show   Next image


Photo Details
Terry S


Friend

Registered: December 2011
Location: Southend on Sea, Essex, England, UK
Posts: 3,797
users gallery
One off of a roll of 120 HP5+, the first taken in a long time outside of my house and garden.


It's a feature on a turned off water feature, in a beautiful part of Priory Park in Southend, in the formal garden.


Both the recipient and I initially thought it to be maybe slightly too dark and lacking in contrast, but both have found it growing on us. I did try a more contrasty print, but this reflects the scene more like what I saw at the time.
· Date: Wed, 4, August, 2021 · Views: 2612
· Filesize: 71.7kb, 59.7kb · Dimensions: 638 x 509 ·
Additional Info
Keywords: Ilford, 120, HP5+, Fuji GA645Zi, Home mixed D76 / ID11, home D72
Film make, size & rating:: Ilford 120 HP5+
Film developer & temp:: Home mixed D76 / ID11
Tripod used Y or N:: No
Paper:: Ilford RC MGV Pearl
Paper developer & temp:: Home mixed D72

Author
Thread  
Terry S
Friend

Registered: December 2011
Location: Southend on Sea, Essex, England, UK
Posts: 3,797
Wed, 4, August, 2021 3:00pm

Again, although the initial scan looked okay on my screen, the uploaded version is a bit darker, especially in the bottom area of plant growth, which should have a lot more detail in it.
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery  
PanFrank

Friend

Registered: July 2017
Posts: 681
Sun, 8, August, 2021 8:56am

Hi Terry,
Like the subject very much and the contrast is just right in my view. I think it is most of the times good not to enhance the reality and keep the look at what we have seen in the moment. Though exceptions may prove the rule, e.g. my print of last round. ;-)
Frank
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery  


Photo Sharing Gallery by PhotoPost
Copyright © 2007 All Enthusiast, Inc.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.