Quote:
Originally Posted by JOReynolds
Photowaffle's print showed severe underexposure - perhaps two or more stops? At that amount of underexposure I don't think the brand or type of film, or the scanner, would have much to do with the result.
'
|
I'd agree except that Photowaffle said in answer to my question that it was only 1 stop underexposed. It might be that C200 can't stand even one stop under or there are other issues with camera and metering resulting in say two stops under.
If the other scans of prints are OK and the above one looks much better then I'd be tempted to conclude that either the scanner settings changed or there is a combination of light/ metering/ shutter/aperture that has resulted in the really "foggy " one
Mike