Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Ilford hp5+ in id11 1+2 times |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
just a little follow up. I developed he hp5 roll 1+2 in id11 for 15:30mins. Was very content and happy with the frame below. ill be heading to print over the weekend as prints show the true quality. i need get better at loading the roll as i get dinks in every roll lol
Last edited by soulstar; 17th February 2020 at 09:29 PM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
soulstar, glad that 1+2 and 15' 30" worked. There is no frame below that I can see.
Thanks Mike |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
that was weird
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
soulstar, if this is a reverse scan of the negative which is fine for the purposes of illustrating a result on a thread and has had nothing done to it then the negative should make a fine print
What was the camera by way of format - 35mm or MF? Thanks Mike |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I used a rz67 proii with the 110mm wide open. It’s medium format 6x7. I found it hard to focus on his eye closest to me. His glasses are in focus. More practice needed lol. I need to pick up the magnifier attachment for the prism. It’s hard to find in Europe |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
As for the picture, I like using lenses wide open, but I feel with this picture, I would have liked maybe a stop or two more exposure, to give just a little more of it in focus. But a good picture anyway. Terry S |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Yes soulstar, what I meant was what you interpreted it to be and Terry summed up well. I know nothing literally of scanning but my understanding is that a normal scan shows the negative as a negative or a print as a print which is positive but a reverse scan turns the negative into a positive as if it were a transparency or print.
In some ways given you are trying to illustrate how your dilution and time handled the negative an actual digital picture of the negative may be the best option. This should be the truest representation of the negative since as I understand matters, a scanner can do things to the negative in terms of alteration without the user realising it which is an attempt to effect an improvement but only serves to mislead viewers to the extent that the negative we then see may not necessarily be the most authentic representation of that negative which detracts from this kind of analysis I hope that makes sense Mike |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
i also fully understand regarding trying to keep things analog. i will do a print this weekend and then see the true potential of the frame |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T-Max 400 in ID11 | vincent | Monochrome Film | 9 | 22nd August 2017 06:50 PM |
HP5 and ID11 1:3 | alexmuir | Monochrome Film | 10 | 4th May 2016 05:52 AM |
Ilford ID11 | John King | Chemical formulae | 39 | 4th October 2014 09:19 AM |
ID11 or D76 | cliveh | Photography in general | 7 | 23rd October 2010 08:39 PM |
Ilford Pan F-Pus 50 asa- development times? | kennethcooke | Ask Les | 3 | 9th June 2009 11:28 PM |