Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Ilford Film Washing sequence |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Ilford Film Washing sequence
Hi guys.
Something to ponder, perhaps. As I plough my way through "The Film Developing Cookbook 2nd edition", I can across an interesting piece about the original Ilford film washing sequence. The original paper by L.F.A. Mason, Ilfords chief researcher, stated that after the first 5 inversions, one should allow the tank to sit for 5 minutes before draining. Then also repeat the 5 minutes sitting after the 10 and 20 inversion steps. To finish, a final rinse in water with a few drops of wetting agent. I'm not sure if Ilford did any further work on their film wash sequence, which resulted in it being modified but the book states that the 5 minute sitting was omitted in published work almost from the start. I am also not sure if any of us follow the 5, 10 and 20 inversions sequence exactly. From all of my discussions with fellow photographers, we all had a feeling that the 5,10,20 sequence was rather to short for comfort and those that did follow it added a few extra steps - just to make sure. FWIW, I do a completely over the top washing sequence, which I have tested for residual Hypo and know it works. I have no desire to change. Martin Last edited by Martin Aislabie; 4th October 2021 at 04:26 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Yes I tend to add a couple of stages to the Ilford procedure. The first fill is only swilled round but vigorously for a few secs and then dumped. However I don't count this as the first step. This starts with the 5 inversions and I do 30 as well before the wetting agent stage.
I hadn't heard of the 5 mins stand stages and don't do this. However I let the 30 inversions water sit in the tank while I set up the wetting agent so maybe the tank gets 2 mins of stand Presumably someone at Ilford asked the question: Is the "stands" really necessary and tried cutting those out to see if the negs suffered. I can only assume that after a period of time by which damage would show was allowed to lapse and then on seeing none, Ilford decided on its current procedure Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Martin,
Yes, I do exactly that - let the film sit after each round of agitations in the wash water. I had read a recommendation somewhere long ago about 10 minute rest periods, so that's what I do. I skip the one after the last round however, and just add wetting agent and hang to dry. But if an Ilford engineer says 5 minutes is good enough then I will follow that and save a bit of time. Thanks for posting this. I also have the FDC book but don't recall seeing it in there.
__________________
Regards, Svend |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
5, 10, 20 does me. Tap water at 20C (or at dev temperature). Ilfotol in distilled water to finish.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I may just be wasting my time in throwing in my extra stages on a "just for luck" basis Mike |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I do the 5, 10 , and 20 sequence but then I added a 15 inversions to be sure to be sure. I don't see any evidence on my negs going back years that the wash sequence was insufficient.
__________________
Cheers Vincent - Not afraid of the dark |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
In my case that probably started in 2005/6 so maximum age of such negs is about 15 years and at the beginning I would have struck religiously to the Ilford sequence before I was influenced by Photrio(APUG as was then) and added extra stages Mind you my gut feeling is that even 15 year old negs should show signs of problems if they are going to Mike |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
But like Michael and Vincent, I've followed the standard Ilford wash sequence since the very early 1980's and all of my negs look fine today. Before that, I used one of the Paterson push in hose type washers, and the negatives from then still look good, although a little dense due to over-development, as I added a bit of extra time onto the times given at that time as well, 'just for luck'. I know I also do what Vincent does and add a few more tank inversions when washing my films now, 'just for luck' again, like others. Better safe than sorry, eh? Terry S |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Martin |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
Regards, Svend |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kodak vs. Ilford rapid fixers and film washing method | Svend | Manufactured brews | 25 | 14th June 2019 01:43 PM |
Film washing? | Robchaos | Monochrome Film | 14 | 6th April 2014 06:35 PM |
The Ilford Washing Sequence | Mike O'Pray | Monochrome Film | 28 | 31st March 2011 10:14 AM |
Ilford film washing method - and for RC papers? | cmolinari | Darkroom | 9 | 16th February 2011 07:30 PM |
Washing sheet film | Martin Aislabie | Monochrome Film | 15 | 24th January 2010 02:01 AM |