Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free:   AG Photographic   The Imaging Warehouse   Process Supplies   RH Designs   Second-hand Darkroom Supplies  

Notices

Go Back   Film and Darkroom User > Monochrome Work > Monochrome printing techniques

  ***   Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks   ***

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26th December 2016, 11:41 AM
photomi7ch's Avatar
photomi7ch photomi7ch is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 2,516
Default Paper fixing

Is there any reason why you should use fix neat when fixing your prints?
The reason I ask is I came across a gentleman on U-tube saying he did this to make sure his prints were fixed properly.
From my understanding when using diluted rapid fix FB print are fully done in a minute.
__________________
Mitch

http://photomi7ch.blogspot.com/

If you eliminate the impossible whatever remains no matter how improbable must be the truth.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26th December 2016, 11:50 AM
Lostlabours Lostlabours is online now
Friend
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: West Midlands/Aegean
Posts: 1,988
Default

You run a very high risk of bleaching the image with undiluted rapid fixer, and this can happen very quickly. Fixers are designed to be used at an optimal strength although with papers, you can use more dilute but for longer. Over fixing in fresh fixer will cut the highlight tones particularly with warm tone papers..

It's possible he's talking about using something like Hypam as 1+9 for the initial fixing and the 1+4 for the second fixing bath, I'd call 1+4 full "working" strength and 1+9 dilute.

Ian

Last edited by Lostlabours; 26th December 2016 at 11:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26th December 2016, 12:34 PM
Richard Gould Richard Gould is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jersey Channel Islands
Posts: 5,433
Default

I would have thought that undiluted fixer with prints would bleach the image,I have seen thic happen even with dilute fixer if overfixed, I use 2 bath fixing for FB prints, dilute at 1/9, or 3 minutes per bath, but I would not fix for longer,
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26th December 2016, 01:06 PM
Mike O'Pray Mike O'Pray is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Daventry, Northants
Posts: 8,968
Default

Just as a matter of interest, Mitch which Utube video was this?

Thanks

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26th December 2016, 04:02 PM
John King John King is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: County Durham
Posts: 3,318
Default

There arre some people who think they are being clever and think they know better than the chemical/paper manufacturers and when it goes belly up they blame the, manufacturers/paper/chemicals in fact anything else but themselves.

I have given up gently advising folk when they are doing the wrong thing and let them stew. This does not only apply to photography! Its their loss not mine
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26th December 2016, 10:35 PM
Maris's Avatar
Maris Maris is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Noosa, Australia
Posts: 183
Default

Undiluted "neat" rapid fixer (Ammonium thiosulphate based) fixes very slowly compared to a 1+4 or even a 1+9 dilution. Why? The reason is that fixer concentrate has very little water in it. The fixation products, silver tetrathionates etc, can't find water to dissolve in and tend to hang around in the film or paper. Ever noticed how heavy a bottle of rapid fixer concentrate is compared to its size. It's nearly all chemicals with just enough water to make it conveniently pourable.
__________________
The word Photography first uttered and defined by its author Sir John Herschel at Somerset House, London on the evening of March 14, 1839: quote "Photography or the application of the Chemical rays of light to the purpose of pictorial representation" unquote.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27th December 2016, 08:01 AM
John King John King is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: County Durham
Posts: 3,318
Default

Another side effect of using undiluted fixer will be, (especially on fibre based papers) the extended washing times needed to clear the paper of chemicals. Unless done properly the residual chemicals will affect the image, possibly in as little 6 months.

My panels to gain my ARPS are close to 30 years old now and the mounts are showing the age but not the prints because the were washed properly
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27th December 2016, 11:37 AM
Lostlabours Lostlabours is online now
Friend
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: West Midlands/Aegean
Posts: 1,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maris View Post
Undiluted "neat" rapid fixer (Ammonium thiosulphate based) fixes very slowly compared to a 1+4 or even a 1+9 dilution. Why? The reason is that fixer concentrate has very little water in it. The fixation products, silver tetrathionates etc, can't find water to dissolve in and tend to hang around in the film or paper. Ever noticed how heavy a bottle of rapid fixer concentrate is compared to its size. It's nearly all chemicals with just enough water to make it conveniently pourable.
However if you place a print that's just been fixed in dilute fixer into concentrated fixer there's some diffusion into the emulsion and image bleaching is very rapid.

Ian
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27th December 2016, 01:52 PM
John King John King is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: County Durham
Posts: 3,318
Default Fixation about fixing

I cannot understand why there needs to be so much deviation from tried and tested methods which have been in place for over 10 decades. There is no 'Holy Grail' that will make extra fixing better, be it extended time or higher concentrations, will allow the print to last longer.

The main key is to wash thoroughly after the main chemical processing is done. Too many prints are not washed enough which allows polution and the conditions under which the print is kept to deteriorate sooner than is should be. 'Wash Aid' will help but it is no real replacement for thorough washing.

Apart from my ARPS prints, I have a few dating back to around 1963/4 and they are going 'off' but after 50 plus years of indifferent storage, that isn't bad.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27th December 2016, 10:59 PM
Martin Aislabie's Avatar
Martin Aislabie Martin Aislabie is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon, England
Posts: 2,080
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photomi7ch View Post
Is there any reason why you should use fix neat when fixing your prints?
The reason I ask is I came across a gentleman on U-tube saying he did this to make sure his prints were fixed properly.
From my understanding when using diluted rapid fix FB print are fully done in a minute.
Fortunately there is no law in the UK against being an idiot and are entitled to free speech

Stick to what the manufacturers say - they know what they are talking about and have the science and the data to prove it.

Martin
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
fix, neat, paper, printing, rapid
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free:   AG Photographic   The Imaging Warehouse   Process Supplies   RH Designs   Second-hand Darkroom Supplies  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
B&W Paper fixing with Kodak Flexicolor C41 fixer/replenisher 25-litres EdBray Manufactured brews 6 11th March 2013 10:05 PM
Tmax fixing and washing Dave miller Monochrome Film 27 11th February 2013 08:19 PM
bellow fixing tape robinb Cameras - Large Format 11 3rd August 2011 07:56 PM
Double bath fixing Miha Monochrome printing techniques 13 4th September 2010 04:50 PM
Correct time fixing Giuseppe Monochrome printing techniques 2 8th September 2009 09:28 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.