Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free:   AG Photographic   The Imaging Warehouse   Process Supplies   RH Designs   Second-hand Darkroom Supplies  

Notices

Go Back   Film and Darkroom User > Colour Work > Colour film

  ***   Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks   ***

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20th November 2019, 11:50 PM
semmeess semmeess is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 3
Exclamation Troubleshooting developing Portra 800

hey everyone, I just performed a shoot with a single roll of Portra 800, new from amazon, in date.

Developed using correct times with replenished fuji C-41 chemistry in a jobo 1500 tank.

I metered the film at ISO 640, spot metering for the face.

https://i.imgur.com/0b5rAXT.png Digital shot context, same ISO setting, same shooting method.

Here's some negatives from the first 'test' part of the roll.

https://i.imgur.com/5oUyXZT.png Negative 1 (completely unaltered)

https://i.imgur.com/94a35TQ.png Negative 1 (auto colour corrected)

https://i.imgur.com/lGdkEVJ.png Negative 2 (completely unaltered)

https://i.imgur.com/fckkJSH.png Negative 2 (Auto color corrected)

I literally just mixed new batches of developer, bleach and fixer with the correct quantities of replenisher and starter as per usual.

What on earth is happening here?? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thankyou!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21st November 2019, 12:35 PM
alexmuir alexmuir is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Glasgow, Scotland.
Posts: 2,668
Default

I haven’t done any C41 processing, but have a lot of experience with B&W. Assuming the film was ok, and not damaged by exposure to excessive heat, for example, I would say that this is a chemistry related problem.
Firstly, since I understand that developer temperature is very important, I would suggest that you check your thermometer for accuracy. If your processor uses a heated water bath, check that it is achieving and maintaining the correct temperature.
If these checks are ok, I would suspect the chemicals themselves. Are they properly mixed, and used in the correct order? Is there any scope for contamination as a result of preparation procedure, or storage? It is possible that they are faulty to begin with, either due to some manufacturing issue, or because the kit has been lying around the retailers premises for a lengthy period. I have twice bought chemicals for B&W that were well out of date, and these came from apparently reputable retailers.
There are people here with good experience of colour work, and they may recognise this type of problem, but checking your equipment and system should help you on the way to a solution.
Alex.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21st November 2019, 01:01 PM
Lostlabours Lostlabours is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: West Midlands/Aegean
Posts: 1,988
Default

I'd prefer to see the negative strips, it looks like a processing issue, maybe incomplete bleaching/fixing.

Ian
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21st November 2019, 04:08 PM
Mike O'Pray Mike O'Pray is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Daventry, Northants
Posts: 8,968
Default

semmess, what Lostlabours has said. Your links direct me to a site that blocks me until I agree to its wishes which no doubt means it ends up knowing things about me to its advantage and given that the only real accurate source of evidence is pictures of your negatives taken by a digital camera then show us them here. My acquaintance with imgur has now ended. Not even a one night stand as they say

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26th November 2019, 04:04 PM
pentaxpete's Avatar
pentaxpete pentaxpete is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brentwood, Essex UK
Posts: 390
Default

That 'site' the link brings us to is annoying -- I do not want to 'Accept' anything BUT on a 'quick flash of the image' before it is overlaid I would say the chemistry is dead and the negatives are dreadfully 'thin'
__________________
Computerised and Slightly DIGITISED but FILM still RULES with ME !
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26th November 2019, 04:20 PM
Anon01 Anon01 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 665
Default

can' t you post directly here as I didn't go there either

BUT all........... if you KEEP clicking/closing and click again it goes away
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26th November 2019, 04:22 PM
Anon01 Anon01 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 665
Default

Just post them here ?????


.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	jyhghjnjyg.jpg
Views:	430
Size:	49.9 KB
ID:	3551  
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26th November 2019, 05:40 PM
John King John King is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: County Durham
Posts: 3,318
Default Poor colour reproduction

They look to me as if the negatives were under exposed or under developed. The sure way to decide which is to look at the wording on the rebate of the film. If they are 'thin' I would suggest underdevelopment.
Either by not having it warm enough for the time it was developed or too short a development time at the right temperature.

It could be all was processed in accordance with the temperatures 3.15 mins/seconds at 38 degrees C in which case the developer was expired/exhausted, or the bleach and fix were not done for long enough. Typically 6 mins @38 degrees C. This could also be the result of using colour bleach and fix for too short a time as well. I always give 7 minutes even through the kit says 6

Looking at the scanned images, even the colour correction software has been unable to correct the problem with the tones on the face being distinctly 'off colour' . Perhaps if you could let us know your method of working, with times, temperatures, make of developer and had it been used before. Also how long since it was made up from the concentrate and how it was stored.

The only other thing that comes to mind is the film expiry date has passed or it has been stored near to a source of heat such as a radiator,
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26th November 2019, 07:25 PM
semmeess semmeess is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 3
Default Thanks everyone

Thanks for the advice. Turns out the issue was being caused by two things; Slightly contaminated developer and the inversion setting on my Jobo machine being set too high.

I developed the rest of the negatives with a fresh batch of developer + slower speed on the Jobo, worked a charm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
800, c41, kodak, portra, troubleshoot
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free:   AG Photographic   The Imaging Warehouse   Process Supplies   RH Designs   Second-hand Darkroom Supplies  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Portra 160 alexmuir Colour film 7 15th September 2017 12:56 PM
Portra 160 RichardWarom Colour film 6 11th January 2014 09:45 PM
New Portra 160 Matt5791 New products and offers 0 14th April 2011 11:42 AM
NEW! Portra 400 now available Matt5791 New products and offers 11 11th January 2011 06:58 PM
New Portra 400 Review- AP Mike O'Pray Colour film 2 7th November 2010 07:54 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.