Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Magnifax 4 Meograde head filter problem |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Magnifax 4 Meograde head filter problem
Until summer last year I had printed using split grade for a long time with my Magnifax 4 and meograde VC head. However since starting to do more standard printing with a single grade I'd begun to notice problems getting good contrast at most of the normal grades 2-4. I visually compared the colour for each grade against the equivalent Ilford under the lens filter and noticed considerably more magenta in the latter except for grade 5 where the Meopta appeared to jump considerably. This would explain the problems I was having so I decided to also do a test and as expected the Ilford filters gave a steady progression from 0-5 in balanced steps with 2-4 having much more punch than the Magnifax's built in filtration.
Has anyone else noticed this issue with either the Meograde or other VC enlarger heads and is it due to age or other problems with the filters themselves? I'm happy to use the Ilford filters now as to be honest there is less chance of disturbing the head when changing them over. Thanks Steve |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Steve - have a word with Roy at RK Photographics, they advertise on this site.
They are the UK importers of Meoptas and Roy is a font of knowledge. Good Luck
__________________
Fenland Camera and Darkroom (Affordable Workshops) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Andrew, I'll drop him a message.
Steve |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I use the Meopta Magnifax 4a with the Meograde head. I am afraid that as I have not used the Ilford filters, I have nothing to compare the results I get with my enlarger. But in answer to your question 'is it an age thing?' I would say not, as here is a little snippet from there color 3 head instruction manual "The interference filters manufactured by the vacuum technique are colourfast, heat resistant, and their life is practically unlimited" I remember the Meograde head being described in the same way and it was one of the deciding factors in my buying the enlarger. I hope this helps Stoo |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Zinc Oxide paint would restore whiteness but you need to be careful because if its transport is some volatile spray it would eat the polystyrene. Artists zinc oxide might be best if necessary. Or line the mixing box with silver foil if necessary. The polystyrene does give a nice diffuse light though.
__________________
An old dog learning new tricks Last edited by Argentum; 15th January 2010 at 09:19 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
dichroic filters are not supposed to fade.
That doesn't mean the mechanism which dials them in or out is particulalrly well calibrated to anything. But I would check the internal colour of your mixing box first.
__________________
An old dog learning new tricks Last edited by Argentum; 15th January 2010 at 09:19 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
ilford G4 and up filters require double exposure time from those lower down. You can't do a direct comparison with dichroic filter colour.
Ilfords figures for Y+M for non durst enlargers are not very accurate in my experience, so the speed point is different than for ilford filters so again you can't make a direct comparison from viewing colour on baseboard. The only worthwhile test is whether the magnifax has a 5 grade range and if it has then you can calibrate it.
__________________
An old dog learning new tricks |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
It may have been opemus I was thinking of but either way I think it was one with a colour head that had the polystyrene mixing box. If yours is a condensor setup then it would be different from the one I used.
__________________
An old dog learning new tricks |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for the information, I'll have a look at the mixing chamber tomorrow, it's the 6x9 if I remember correctly. If it turns out to be 'yellowed' I may get the 6x6 as they're not too expensive and that's my standard neg size these days.
I've had it around 5 years now so it may be something that's happened gradually but as I said in the original post there is quite a visual difference between the colour of the Meograde head and the Ilford filters in the commonly used 2-4 bracket. For the Ilford filters it's simply a case of doubling exposures for grades 4-5. Steve |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
the ilford filters have neutral density built into them so that they speed match. Your dichroic filters do it by cancelling out yellow or magenta by over adding the opposite one to get give a net neutral density. The resultant brightness and printing times are different so you can not make any kind of accurate comparison by looking at colour on baseboard since G2 with ilford filter would require different compared to G2 Y+M from your VC head. One of them would look lighter than the other because of neutral density differences.
__________________
An old dog learning new tricks |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
De Vere 250W Tran stab and Head | Xpres | Sale or Wanted | 0 | 20th December 2009 09:53 AM |
New LED enlarger head | alfie | Darkroom | 25 | 24th October 2009 06:31 PM |
ETRS problem | S Raff | Cameras - medium format | 8 | 11th April 2009 10:26 AM |
Colour head or under the lens filters? | John | Monochrome printing techniques | 10 | 6th February 2009 11:05 AM |