Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Multigrade |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
pentaxuser |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
When changing contrast filters the question is what changes and what stays the same.
With the latest Ilford filters and their Multigrade Classic paper the exposure stays the same for grades 00 to 3 and asks an extra 9% or so for grades 4 and 5. The highlights are the thing that stays the same and the shadows can be racked up and down as the paper grade changes. In theory. This works for small changes in contrast but for a big change I'll run another test strip just to be sure.
__________________
The word Photography first uttered and defined by its author Sir John Herschel at Somerset House, London on the evening of March 14, 1839: quote "Photography or the application of the Chemical rays of light to the purpose of pictorial representation" unquote. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
My experience is different to Maris's. He says the highlights stay the same when the same exposure is given at different grades ( with Ilfords latest filters and Mgd Classic.) When I tried this a few years ago with Mgd.4 the mid tone stayed the same, and the highlights and shadows both changed. When going to a higher grade the shadows got darker and the highlights got lighter. More contrast. When going to a lower grade the opposite happened. The shadows got lighter and the highlights got darker. Less contrast. This was in a Leitz Valoy condenser enlarger and a traditional pearl bulb. I did the experiment then did it again with an LED of 2800K to see if it worked the same. It did.
Colour temperature of the lamp is important here. I used to use a fluorescent light in a home-made 5x4 enlarger. This worked as Maris has described. The highlights stayed the same at the same exposure with different grades. If anyone is confused about this I would advise them to do a simple experiment. Next time you do a really nice print with no burning or dodging on, say, grade 2.5, make more prints with the same exposure. 1.5, 0.5 and 3.5. Then go to 4.5 with more exposure. These four prints will show you exactly what is happening, with your set-up. And my bet is that in the future you will always opt to do another test strip when moving to a higher or lower grade in order to try to get a better print, rather than keeping to the same exposure and hoping for the best. Alan |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with Alan. If you look at the paper curves supplied by Ilford then they cross at the speed point which Ilford take to be a mid-grey. That is the tone that will stay the same with constant time and changed filters.
Bill |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multigrade 5 | Dave Hall | Monochrome printing techniques | 9 | 20th March 2020 02:10 PM |
Multigrade Filters | John King | Darkroom | 7 | 2nd February 2020 09:45 PM |
Multigrade 500 Head | PeterMcC | Darkroom | 2 | 23rd May 2016 07:25 PM |
Multigrade dev | photomi7ch | Monochrome printing techniques | 8 | 2nd June 2011 12:25 PM |
The Other Multigrade | Dave miller | Chemical formulae | 17 | 16th December 2008 09:05 PM |