Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Economical substitute for DD-X? |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You can develop up to ten films in a litre of Microphen (with an additional 10% extra dev time per film) which makes it much better value. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Brock I hadn't read further into the instruction sheet and should have. It would look as if that makes a stock solution which is reused only slightly less economical than a 1+3 and dump each time and it gives you whatever benefit comes from using stock solution.
The only downside is the added time which by film 10 is 90%. So towards the end times for the likes of D3200 start to get long but given it's a hobby that hardly a concern Mike |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks all - looks like I've got a few to try. I will perhaps order a few of these suggestions and experiment with them and see what I prefer.
I have always aimed towards a fine grained neg, but now also low contrast, as it seems to suit my printing technique/condenser enlarger. I can very easily get a lot of contrast so that's not an issue which often is for some |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If it's fine grain you're after and softer contrast then Microphen might be just the ticket. Others can confirm or refute this, but it's worth checking out. Also, Perceptol would be ideal for this, but there is about 1/3 stop speed loss if used at 1+1 dilution (more if used undiluted), and it's not terribly economical. Lots to mull over here. Good luck!
__________________
Regards, Svend |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yes, the +90% is a pain Mike. Some people claim to keep to the original time with no ill effects although I’m not brave enough to try that. I haven’t tried 1+3 either after reading a couple of negative things about it - it’s apparently not so good for a speed boost for a start - but you’ll get 10 35mm films out of it or 8 120 rolls in a Paterson tank. I’m sticking with Microphen mainly because it’s good and makes it possible most of the time to shoot handheld with Delta 400. I’ll do anything to get rid of the tripod. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Brock on a practical note which may also help George Have you found a time limit to how long you have to do 10 films i.e. is the small amount of air left each time in the 1L container for the cumulative period of the development times a problem in your experience?
I suppose that if the container is a flexible PET bottle such as a 1L soda water bottle then each time it is poured into the tank you could simply squeeze it to force the remaining liquid back up the neck until you are ready to pour the developer back into the bottle? Air is usually the biggest enemy but as it is a matter of minutes each time then the squeeze may not be necessary Thanks Mike |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
In the old days of Agfa, their Rodinal Special (nothing to do with Rodinal, and also called Studional) was a similar developer to DDX and their instructions referred to reusing the working solution but only within a time frame. For longer times between use and reuse there was a percentage increase in time recommended.
Lots of people have reported diluting DDX further than 1+4, some a bit to lengthen dev time and reduce contrast a bit, some to 1+9 for economy. But the OP already reuses the 1+4 working solution, so reusing a more diluted working solution might run into problems of keeping times or efficacy. Most alternative developers will result in some speed drop which is hard to give up. Microphen is now available only in 1L packs which make it close to the price of DDX anyway. The instructions for diluting it further (1+3) could probably apply to DDX also: my worry would be reuse of the diluted developer after some storage time. I mix up ID-68 from ingredients and that satisfies my need to use a more economical speed increasing developer but I must admit that the initial setup costs (a 10 year supply of phenidone, kilograms of various other ingredients) make the saving an illusion I suppose. I do use most of the same ingredients for paper developer and there is a saving there. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That’s not been a problem for me, Mike. So far! I always try to use up developer well within its use-by date. To be honest, I usually dump the dev after eight or nine films anyway to be on the safe side. The few occasions where I done the full ten have been fine so I’m probably just being over-cautious. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
I just checked on AG Photographic’s site. Reusing the stock Microphen solution to do ten films or using it one-shot at 1+2 (also does ten films) works out at 68p per 35mm film. Using DDX at 1+4 works out at £1.56 per film. Microphen at 1+1 is £1.13 per 35mm film which is still a decent saving over DDX.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If using one-shot, DDX can be diluted further than 1+4. It's quite potent stuff. |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anti-newton glass substitute | GoodOldNorm | Darkroom | 6 | 23rd June 2019 09:10 PM |
Grey card substitute | GoodOldNorm | Photography in general | 54 | 23rd August 2015 06:07 PM |
Ilford FB matt Substitute | kimberellie | Introductions | 3 | 25th October 2010 07:51 PM |