Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Lightweight FB paper? |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lightweight FB paper?
In my limited but enthusiastic recent experience of making B&W prints, I've mostly used Ilford MGRC paper as standard. I got a pack of Kentmere RC paper a while ago to make up an order to a 'free shipping' value, and was interested to find it was a bit lighter than Ilford, ie thinner. This makes it good for contact sheets as they then take up less space in a folder with the negs.
Does anyone have a suggestion as to whether there is a yet lighter-weight RC paper and if so what it is? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
This cropped up some months ago and I checked the thickness of MG4, MG5 and Kentmere and they are all the same. To do this I used a micrometer.
What I have noticed since then is MG5 is slightly harder to tear when it is dry so there may be some sort of heavier/stronger base layer in the paper that make is feel thicker. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Once upon a time (late 70s/early 80s) Kodak and perhaps others, supplied FB paper in either Single or Double weight.
I have not seen anything like a single weight paper for a very long time. Personally, I'm just pleased the economics still work for someone to produce both an RC and FB base paper. We just have to accept that our storage files are full with contact prints taking up most of the space. Martin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
All RC papers are the same weight, mediumweight, and the same base thickness, execpt for Ilford Portfolio, which is double weight RC, back in my youth most major suppliers made FB paper in single weight, doudle weight, and some papers were trible weight, I would buy single weight paper as it was cheaper, and my pocket money went further, then single weight and triple weight disappeared from the shelves, only double weight left, then in more recent times Ilford art 300 came along, and again we have a triple weight 0luxery paper, hence 30 sheets per pack instead of 50, but RC has always beem medium weight and same thikness
Richard
__________________
jerseyinblackandwhite.blogspot.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks all- I could have sworn the Kentmere was a bit thinner but I guess the Vernier doesn't lie... and yes, Martin, the files will just fill up quicker!
MJ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The way to measure paper thickness is by measuring a block and then dividing by the number of sheets. That minimizes the compression error.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
.01mm is negligible, 1 mm is measurable easily. In fact using micrometer you can set the adjustment screw so that it would not compress a sheet of photographic paper. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
If you tighten a micrometer by turning the ratchet stop - as you should - then, as John says, you get no compression.
Alan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Just idle curiosity on my part as photography probably had not entered my radar when lightweight FB was last around but other than lower cost what other advantages, if any, did it have over its heavier brother
Was it for instance harder or easier to flatten or about the same and once flattened did it stay as flat? Thanks Mike |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
If I remember correctly It was a real problem to flatten, took a good week under a large pile of the heaviest books you could find, some times, in fact it almost rolled up, It was at one time known as airmail paper as it was so light you could post prints across the world half the price of heavy weight paper, also it was very useful for the press photographers, remembering this was long before RC paper, and could be dried faster, heat flattened, much faster than double weight paper, and the faster it was ready for the press the better, it stayed flatter easier than double weight or triple weight paper, which, even today, can have a tendency to curl slightly even when dry, and back in the days of this type of paper, always known as WSG, or white smooth glossy, most prints were glazed, even the Amateur photographer, as we were known back in the day, had a means of glazing their prints, and SW paper glazed easier, many a good print was ruined at the glazing stage. Ah memories of Temps Passe
Richard
__________________
jerseyinblackandwhite.blogspot.com |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paper negs and printing through paper | wiesmier | Darkroom | 10 | 5th February 2009 09:21 AM |