Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Graded or VC papers for Pyro-Negs? |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Graded or VC papers for Pyro-Negs?
On some photo forums, it is argued that graded papers provide the best highlights, while VC papers can makes whites look a bit dull and dirty, so some feedback from those who enlarge their pyro/cathecol based developers please on your own preferences and findings.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
As far as I can tell, most of the original dev times given for PMK by Gordon Hutchings were based on printing on graded papers. If you take those same negs and print them on VC paper without filtration, they will print with much lower contrast and highlights will have very little separation. Also local contrast throughout the print will be reduced greatly. The yellow green stain filters out a lot of blue light. That is equivalent to dialling in extra yellow on your filters which reduces contrast. However, if you give extra neg development you can compensate for that loss of contrast and get it all back. But the print HD curve will be different from a normal negative developer. You either like it or you don't. And because graded papers are only sensitive to blue light, and the stain is supposedly proportional to density, then highlight contrast is increased throughout the print, meaning local contrast is increased. But again this is largely controlled by development.
I think a lot of people never do proper print testing when calibrating neg dev. They just take the given dev times from sites such as DigitalTruth and think it applies to VC paper when often it doesn't. Hence the opinion that Pyro devs give flat highlights. Yes they will if you don't give the correct devlopment. But then so will normal developers. The easy answer is to take a pyro neg and print it on both graded and VC paper and see the difference which is dramatic. But if you give the neg enough dev for VC paper and then try and print it on graded paper, then it will probably be much too contrasty. i.e. pyro negs are not usually good for printing on both types of paper, you pick one or other type to calibrate your development. But if your standard is to print on graded and you have a neg which is too contrasty, then you can print on VC to get some control back. Or if calbrate to print on VC and you have a soft neg, then you can print on graded paper to get some contrast back.
__________________
An old dog learning new tricks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Ag, the majority of my negatives, certainly 135 to 4x5, are developed to print on VC papers. I must say I'm very happy with the ease of printing and how they look using a Multigrade 500 head set on average at grade 2.5. By trying to peg negatives that print at g2.5 I'm exactly midway between the extremes of grades (g0-5 with this head). This allows me the maximum of flexability in my printing.
I've not tried to print them on graded papers. I don't use the science of sensitometry, I rely on my emotions, if it looks and feels right to me then I can live with it. Perhaps odd for someone who has worked in the sciences all of their working life The staining developers I now use are PMK pyro, Pyrocat-HD and 510-pyro.
__________________
"To the attentive eye, each moment of the year has its own beauty, and in the same field, it beholds, every hour, a picture which was never seen before, and which will never be seen again" Ralph Waldo Emerson. Timespresent Arenaphotographers |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Care is needed here. On VC paper the stain is contrast reducing. On graded paper it is the opposite, i.e. contrast increasing. This is because Graded is only sensitive to blue light and the stain is proportional (apparently). That means the denser highlights have more stain and therefore filter more blue light in the highlights which means paper prints whiter. However, a properly developed pyro neg looks thin and the reason is because the stain adds that printing density. Hutchings suggests viewing pyro negs on a light box through a blue filter to give a better visual idea of how it will print. The blue filter makes it look more like a normal negative.
__________________
An old dog learning new tricks |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=Ag-Bromide;4509]SNIP; On some photo forums, it is argued that graded papers provide the best highlights, while VC papers can makes whites look a bit dull and dirty.[QUOTE]
All I can say here is they are not using the VC printing grades correctly when needed. If I need a bit more bite to the high values I burn-in or pre-flash (vary rarely) using a higher grade, for me one of the beauties of split grade printing.
__________________
"To the attentive eye, each moment of the year has its own beauty, and in the same field, it beholds, every hour, a picture which was never seen before, and which will never be seen again" Ralph Waldo Emerson. Timespresent Arenaphotographers |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Trevor, I knew you were a user of staining developers and was hoping that you would contribute to this thread. (I don't use the science of sensitometry, I rely on my emotions, if it looks and feels right to me then I can live with it. Perhaps odd for someone who has worked in the sciences all of their working life), and with your 2nd post. (All I can say here is they are not using the VC printing grades correctly when needed. If I need a bit more bite to the high values I burn-in or pre-flash (vary rarely) using a higher grade, for me one of the beauties of split grade printing).
Without seeing an enlargement made from a pyro negative, it`s not easy to understand what some people mean by flat highlights on VC papers and your point of them not using the VC grades correctly is a valid point. I haven`t bought a staining developer yet, so maybe I will try one sold by Silverprint, Retrophotographic or Peter Hogan. I wont buy the raw chemicals though. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I believe that the differences in the negatives produced using different developers are somewhat irrelevant at the printmaking stage. My view is that photographers who produce prints with dull highlights as suggested in this thread are simply making the wrong judgement when making the tests for the print.
For example, in split grade printing many printers use too much soft filtration, ruin the highlights and produce dull flat prints. An important and unavoidable fact is that prints dry darker and highlights are lost, a fact that many printers ignore or have not yet figured that these things happen. For years I've taught workshops and in colleges and found these two factors the most common cause of poor dull prints. Trevor touched on this problem in one of his posts when he mentioned using a slightly harder grade when using VC paper. I started my printing on graded papers and still use them but also use VC papers, making the choice of which paper being dependent on the qualities I need in the image. Toning is a good example for both papers respond differently to selenium, gold and sepia. I also use a number of different developers including a staining dev but they are not considered when I make the print. I'm very happy to rely on my judgement and printing abilities. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
There is no magic bullet that so many contibutors to forums swear-by. Chemistry, paper and toners are simply tools for us to use and learn about. I firmly believe that excellent prints can be made from all combinations but to do so requires hard work and application from the photographer/printer. To believe in the "magic bullet" is, in my opinion to be living in a fantasy world. This is why I believe that judgement is the strongest and most useful tool in our armoury. |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Developing times and thin negs. | vincent | Monochrome Film | 6 | 18th May 2009 10:17 AM |
Printing on Graded Paper Using a Colour Head | Neil Smith | Monochrome printing techniques | 8 | 17th May 2009 11:03 AM |
Graded B&W papers. | Ag-Bromide | Ask Les | 1 | 19th March 2009 01:39 PM |
Resin coated papers versus Fibre-based papers. | Ag-Bromide | Monochrome printing techniques | 23 | 3rd January 2009 04:48 PM |
Who prints on graded papers and why? | Argentum | Monochrome printing techniques | 25 | 29th November 2008 11:16 PM |