Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> ilford multigrade filters love them or hate them |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Beneath the lens filters add another and UNCOATED surface to get the light to pass through. I use an LPL7700 with a colour head and have never had a problem multigrade printing. I don't need speed, but I do need filters that don't fade and dichric filters fit that bill precisely.
I can also fine tune the contrast by dialing in a figure between those suggested by ilford that will give me even more flexibility. Dichroic filters are 100% flexible, individual filters are not - they have a fixed value. You also have the option of using the yellowand magenta together the exposures remain more or less constant between G1 and G4. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I use a Durst Graduate enlarger and a De Vere 203 Dichromat MKII and with both I try to avoid any contrast control if at all possible. If you expose and develop the film to suit the enlarger you are using, contrast control should not be necessary. Simplicity is the key to success.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Contrast
Quote:
Agreed, I generally manage to print at G2 or at most G3 and of course G2 needs no filtration. Sometimes this poses a problem with prints up to 9.5 x 12 because the LPL MX head is so bright the lens needs to be stopped right down to get reasonable times allowing a bit of dodging or burning. Whatever I still manage to get what I want. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I use both the Ilford filters, and those fitted to colour heads. I've never found the Ilford 'below the lens' type to cause any noticeable reduction in print quality. If they are handled carefully, which is easy given their intelligent design, they shouldn't end up scratched or damaged. They do seem to fade eventually, but it takes a long time in normal use. They are very quick and easy to use, and I don't see any great advantage in smaller grade increments. I would find it difficult to distinguish a print made at Grade 2 from one at Grade 2.5. They are very convenient for split grade printing.
The colour heads I use are Durst, LPL and Leitz. They all do the job, but are less convenient for split grade work, or if you simply want to burn in an area at a different grade. It's easy, however, with the exception of Leitz, to fit the Ilford holders below the lens if preferred, and keep the colour head for colour prints. Alex |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
That isn't to say that others can't distinguish prints at less than half grades but half grades are enough for me. Mike |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
I also find them easy my Kaiser colour head enlarger has a filter drawer and I cut my filters to size to fit snug, where its a bit more tricky is with my Beseler 45 condenser head this has a slot above the condenser and I have not been able to find or make a suitable holder for the filters so have to carefully lay them on top of the glass but it works ok.
Richard |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The only time I use a filter that is not from the colour head is when I print B&W onto colour paper. I fit a square of bleached and fixed but unexposed film 120 colour film above the negative carrier which gives me instantly a base filtration to obtain quite superb black without a colour bias on RA4 paper.
Why do I do it - simply because I can. It is also cheaper doing it that way that diluting a quantity of B&W developer (minimum of 100cc) just to make one 12x16 when all I have to do is use the RA4 developer in my NOVA. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
I stopped using multigrade filters when my colour enlarger turned up. It has simplified my work flow and taken away the extra dust collecting surface. Bliss
__________________
Mitch http://photomi7ch.blogspot.com/ If you eliminate the impossible whatever remains no matter how improbable must be the truth. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I used a Vivitar 356 enlarger during my previous printing sessions (from 1982 onwards), and that came as standard with a colour mixing head, which I never used, as it was so much easier to open the side door on the light house, and place a multigrade filter on top of the condenser. I'm now hoping to get a Focomat V35 with Variocontrast head into use, and I expect I'll give the head a try. On the V35 there's no easy way to place an mg filter above the negative.
__________________
Malcolm Stewart Milton Keynes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
The V35 is a great enlarger. The colour head works well for multigrade paper. Ilford give specific values for this enlarger. I've never used the multi contrast module. If you want to use Ilford filters, the below lens holder can be attached, but it's not ideal due to the focusing mechanism.
Alex Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multigrade filters. | vanannan | Auctions of Interest | 6 | 22nd January 2016 09:01 PM |
Leitz V35 and Multigrade filters | alexmuir | Monochrome printing techniques | 2 | 26th July 2015 07:22 PM |
Wanted: Ilford Multigrade filters for MGIV | jdhealey | Sale or Wanted | 0 | 29th June 2013 11:22 PM |
Ilford Multigrade Under the Lens Filters | Andrew Bartram | Sale or Wanted | 0 | 5th October 2011 04:35 PM |
multigrade filters | jonsparkes | Filters | 2 | 9th August 2011 07:03 PM |