Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Contrast problem solved |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Contrast problem solved
I have been struggling to get deep blacks and whites in my prints and have just found out what the problem was. It was the multigrade filters I was using. I started using under lens filters after my old enlarger lacked contrast with the colour head. Swapping to under lens filters I got better results (not brilliant but better). I have since got myself a LPL 7700 and fitted it with the under lens filters but being a novice printer I thought my photography was at fault until tonight. I printed a neg using grade 5 @ 15 secs using the under lens filters. I then printed the same neg but using the enlargers colour head set at grade 5 @ 15 sec. The difference was unbelievable. The print has really deep blacks and the whites are pristine. I feel so pleased that a printed the neg after doing a new step wedge and the print was the best print I have ever made, a simple problem fixed has made all the difference.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Good news. The problem with under the lens filters is that they wear. Ilford recommends buying fresh every few years or so. It isn't cheap so to do. Dichroic head filters operate on a different principle of interference and do not wear in the same way.
If an authority such as Ralph Lambrecht favours the control that dichroic heads give and no-one seems to dispute that they last much longer than under the lens filters then you have to wonder why those who have dichroic heads bother with under the lens filters. Unless of course someone here knows different as I have to admit that I have read books by at least one respected printer who advocates under the lens filters. I await the counter arguments, in the constructive debate sense of course as I am not trying to start a war. Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
One more thing to watch for with Dichro heads - As the lamps age, the colour changes ever so slightly. The upshot is that you suddenly realise that the prints are not hitting the grade you thought you had dialed in. It is well worth keeping a couple of spare lamps to hand for such eventuality.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
What papers are you using ? If Ilford MG !V it is advisable to use Ilford MG 1V filters to get the best out of it.
Neil.
__________________
"The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance." Aristotle Neil Souch |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
My enlarger has a black & white head rather than colour, and I use multigrade filters which slot into the enlarger filter drawer. I don't have much experience of below the lens filters so couldn't really say which of the two is best.
__________________
Carl. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Dichroic filters don't fade as they are not actually coloured filters but they use interferenc to create the required colour.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichroic_filter Quote:
Steve. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I believe not all enlargers have filters that are capable of achieving the extreme grades though. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
With regard to fading of filters, I found this company who sell Dichroic filters, hey have some of the peg, circular and square and some round, as well as a made to order option.
http://www.uqg.co.uk/ Neil |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I use Ilford multigrade RC papers and I know the white light lever is down and when I was using the below lens filters I frequently checked that the colour head filters all read zero so i am confident that it was the below lens filters that was a fault.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I am one of those who use and Under the Lens set of Filters
A couple of years ago I was struggling to get a sufficiently hard grade on a print. In frustration, I stopped printing the Neg and began testing instead. I printed my 5x4 Step Wedge – mounted in the Neg Carrier I found two very interesting points My MG Filter Set were well past their sell by date, while there was a logical progression in paper hardness from G00 to G4 but G4.5 and 5 were only actually G3.5 My Enlarging Lens flared badly, spilling an amazing amount of light out of the print shadows in to the print highlights – which wasn’t doing much for my contrast either. The MG Filter set were about 15 years old, so perhaps there is something to Ilford claim they should be replaced every few years. Martin |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Contrast increase needed for pinhole images | Niall Bell | Alternate printing processes | 13 | 12th September 2010 08:13 PM |
Increasing Negative Contrast | HopALong | Ask Les | 4 | 17th July 2010 07:21 PM |
Neg Contrast for split grade printing? | Argentum | Ask Les | 2 | 26th January 2010 12:03 PM |
Normal contrast | Argentum | Monochrome Film | 4 | 1st April 2009 01:20 AM |
contrast v resolution | Argentum | Monochrome printing techniques | 5 | 30th October 2008 08:38 PM |