Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free:   AG Photographic   The Imaging Warehouse   Process Supplies   RH Designs   Second-hand Darkroom Supplies  

Notices

Go Back   Film and Darkroom User > Chemistry > Manufactured brews

  ***   Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks   ***

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th January 2015, 10:20 AM
Keith Tapscott.'s Avatar
Keith Tapscott. Keith Tapscott. is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,150
Default Tetenal Paranol-S

Has anyone tried this B&W film developer yet? I have just ordered some and I see that the times recommended differ from those given for Adox RO9 (formerly AGFA RODINAL).

http://shop.silverprint.co.uk/Tetena...t/2741/102106/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16th January 2015, 07:41 AM
Keith Tapscott.'s Avatar
Keith Tapscott. Keith Tapscott. is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,150
Default

I was under the impression when ordering, that the dilutions and times would be the same as Adox RO9, but clearly not from reading Tetenal's technical data sheet.

I am beginning to regret ordering it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th January 2015, 07:51 AM
Richard Gould Richard Gould is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jersey Channel Islands
Posts: 5,433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Tapscott. View Post
I was under the impression when ordering, that the dilutions and times would be the same as Adox RO9, but clearly not from reading Tetenal's technical data sheet.

I am beginning to regret ordering it.
Keith, sometimes it is better the devil you know, I was tempted until I saw the price, and read the data sheet, the dilutions are the same, but I think it is a similer developer to RO9, but not quite the same, and though it will be good if Tetenal is anything to go by I have half a bottle of RO9 here so I will give it a pass, but I will interested to know how you get on with it
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16th January 2015, 09:02 AM
Paulographic Paulographic is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mid Pennines
Posts: 836
Default

Ilford Delta... 40 minutes @1:50 !!!!!!!
Yet Rollei Retro 400 7 minutes at the same dilution?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th January 2015, 08:19 AM
Rob Archer's Avatar
Rob Archer Rob Archer is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kings Lynn, Norfolk - flatlands and big skies.
Posts: 1,248
Default

That sounds like a printing error to me. I'd treat those times with caution! Having said that, stand development (I.e. no agitation) for 40 minutes at a higher dilution like 1:100 might work. Sadly films getting a bit too expensive to do wild experiments with these days
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17th January 2015, 09:28 AM
Keith Tapscott.'s Avatar
Keith Tapscott. Keith Tapscott. is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,150
Default

Thanks for the replies, I don't want to go through the rigmarole of testing this developer, so I will probably send it back and exchange it for either Adox RO9 or my usual dev.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17th January 2015, 12:17 PM
Mike O'Pray Mike O'Pray is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Daventry, Northants
Posts: 8,985
Default

I also wondered about the times stated in the PDF but on closer inspection there is a kind of ratio from 1:25 to 1:50 that seems to apply fairly consistently to all films.

For instance the difference between Kodak 3200 and Ilford 3200 is also fairly large and yet I would have thought that they have to be similar films.

So yes it is a little disconcerting to see these differences and it would make me nervous if I had bought the developer but on the other hand the rational me assumes that each film has been tested to the same contrast index and the PDF was then proof-read

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 3rd October 2015, 01:19 PM
chounws chounws is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1
Default Retro 400s dev. with Paranol S underdeveplop

First development of film Rollei Retro 400s with Paranol S following the instruction to Develop at 20C 7 mins 1+50 diluted with outcome underdevelopment as picture attached.
Who have an proper development structure to share would be very appreciated.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	raw0001-32.jpg
Views:	395
Size:	260.6 KB
ID:	2393  
Reply With Quote
Reply
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free:   AG Photographic   The Imaging Warehouse   Process Supplies   RH Designs   Second-hand Darkroom Supplies  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tetenal RC paper Mike O'Pray Darkroom 2 3rd November 2013 11:27 PM
Tetenal Vario fix wiesmier Photography in general 4 9th April 2012 05:41 PM
Tetenal Eukobrom Paulographic Monochrome printing techniques 4 27th January 2012 02:21 PM
Tetenal C41 kit 1L, swap for something more useful :) Puggie Sale or Wanted 0 6th April 2011 12:16 PM
Tetenal E6 Chemicals Gary Spicer Darkroom 5 11th November 2010 03:05 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.