Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Does Ilford Harman make film to be sold using other names |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Does Ilford Harman make film to be sold using other names
I see Ilford make a wide variety of film with the names Ilford and Kentmere on the box. Is Adox or Rollei film made by Harman? Does Harman cut its Ilford branded films from the best part of the master rolls then sell off the inferior cuts to be sold under other names? Its a question I should have asked on their last factory tour. If I was to contact Harman and ask for a factory tour in 2017 would any FADU members be interested?
__________________
"Tea is surely the king of all drinks. It helps against the cold, it helps against the heat,against discomfort and sickness, against weariness and weakness". Heinrich Harrer. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I think it is complicated, Norm. Harman or Pemberstone as it now is does make films for others as in it makes the Fuji B&W C41 film which some might regard as a rival to XP2+. I think but I am not sure if make is the right term. I have seen the word "confections" used as in "does the key bits" like adding the emulsion.
I have yet to see a full list of other makes films that Ilford has a hand in making nor do I expect to given the commercial nature of this. If you were to trawl all the threads on this subject on APUG and sort the wheat from the chaff it might( I wouldn't put it stronger than that) be possible to draw up a full and true list but even then questions might remain What it says emphatically that it does not do is simply re-badge its own film for a rival so for instance HP5+, D400 etc is unique to Ilford/Pemberstone. I don't think I have ever seen anyone ask the question: Does it sell or turn "offcuts" which may be inferior, to others as their films or sell under a mysterious unknown source so to speak. I feel certain it does not. I am not sure if I have cleared anything up here or muddied the waters further. I have managed two Ilford tours so don't think I'd bother with a third Mind you if I were to be on a tour and you were to ask that question of "selling off inferior cuts" then I promise to remain by your side in case you were to disappear in one of the darker areas of the factory, never to be seen again Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ilford has made film for a number of other companies including Fuji as Mike says they make Fuji's c41 B&W film but they also made their High Speed B&W film at one time, and Fuji Rembrandt B&W paper.
However they don't sell any of their own "brabded" films or papers to third parties, they are emulsions especially for those companies which have included Adox (Fotoimpex) AgfaPhoto (APX100), Bergger etc. It's important to realise that current AgfaPhoto films have no link with Agfa themselves or their original films, the colour film is Fuji, The APX100 is made by Ilford and is completely different to the original film of the same name. So a master roll of FP$ all gets sold as FP4 except any found defective which is scrapped. Ian |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
You are right I may have to re-phrase it as edge or end/beginning of the master role. There used to be a saying if anything was made that was poor quality or faulty "It was made on the Friday night shift" when all that people were bothered about was getting home after a long week.
__________________
"Tea is surely the king of all drinks. It helps against the cold, it helps against the heat,against discomfort and sickness, against weariness and weakness". Heinrich Harrer. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Ilford sell film both marketed and priced at the quality end of the market.
It is therefore imperative that they protect their brand in that niche by only selling quality products. All their off cuts and potentially dodgy coatings are now scrapped/recycled internally. Other than their own slightly more economical range of Kentmere films, they do not sell their own products under a different marketing name/brand. Ilford/Harman do coat the Fuji equivalent of Ilford XP2 on behalf of Fuji. However, there is a world of difference between coating material on behalf of A N Other manufacturer and selling your own product under several different brands. Back in the days when analogue was the only show in town, companies like Ilford and its main competitors would sometimes sell their suspect coated material off cheaply through chosen 3rd parties. However, after the management buy out of the company 10 years or so ago, Ilford immediately stopped that practice as it not only undermined their own market quality niche but also their products price premium. So, while it is possible to buy cheaper brands than Ilford, be under no doubt, it is not Ilford material, no matter who tells you that it is. Martin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The other side of this is the products made for 3rd parties by Ilford/Harman pass through the same high quality controls as their own branded products. I know that some of the emulsion components for the Fuji films Ilford made (make) were supplied by Fuji themselves. Initially the agreement between Ilford & Fuji was the UK made Fuji films wouldn't be sold in the main Ilford markets Europe and US unfortunately there were so many grey imports that had to change. The Ilford/Fuji link was never secret, it was covered in the BJP and newspapers, I saw it announced in the Telegraph. The Bergger and Adox links for certain products have also been out in the open, as is the source of APX100 (current). Ian |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yes - that is exactly what I meant. Martin |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I have bought some kentmere film its only made in 35mm at the moment I will try it out after Christmas it has made me wonder what its like is it a copy of a old film or a copy of a current film if you have used it whats it like.
www.essexcockney.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I think Ilford do protect some of their 'top end' films by not making a similar one with the same ISO. FP4+ and Pan F for example. With others you can generally tell if they are not from Ilford by looking at the processing times for different developers for instance. Also if you are a constant user of Delta 100 then use say Kentmere 100 you will be able to tell by the size of the grain (or lack of it) when enlarged.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
From what I've read elsewhere Kentmere 100 and 400 are lower silver versions of FP4+ and HP5+, so in practice this probably means less exposure latitude, less ability to push process or otherwise abuse them? Lower silver levels makes sense for why they can knock em out cheaper. I shout a few rolls last year at box speed in the Xpan. The 100 seemed quite nice, 400 was a bit grainy but I must admit I never ran a direct comparison to HP5 or TriX. Still I printed a 10x27" print (scanned then printed by Ilfordlab) for my sister and it looked pretty decent. Film seemed to dry nice and flat too.
|
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
20% off at Ilford Harman Express shop. | jeztastic | New products and offers | 3 | 13th December 2016 03:53 PM |
Harman Sold! | Barry | News and Announcements | 36 | 20th September 2015 10:16 AM |
Go retro - they still make film you know | JohnM | Photography in general | 0 | 2nd October 2013 01:14 AM |
If the film business is sold off at least it has a chance of surviving | Argentum | Photography in general | 7 | 6th December 2012 04:58 PM |
Harman / Ilford | Martin Reed | Photography in general | 92 | 11th March 2011 04:12 PM |