Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free:   AG Photographic   Keyphoto   The Imaging Warehouse   Process Supplies   RH Designs   RK Photo   Second-hand Darkroom Supplies   Silverprint Ltd

Notices

Go Back   Film and Darkroom User > Equipment > Darkroom

  ***   Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks   ***

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th September 2010, 05:50 AM
akyiia's Avatar
akyiia akyiia is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southampton
Posts: 14
Red face Size of prints

Hey guys, I am wondering about the size of prints you do or plan to do.. I am building my own darkroom and as I browse websites and look for developing trays I noticed I can't find any place where they sell developing trays larger than 20x24" (except for Silverprint who sells 37x48" trays for Ģ111.99 per piece) So my question is: does any of you print larger size than 20x24"..?? BTW, I don't want to create a duplicate thread so if this topic was discussed somewhere else
( I couldn't find any other thread but..) I think the administrator can just delete it after few days.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15th September 2010, 06:25 AM
Neil Smith Neil Smith is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carmarthenshire Wales
Posts: 1,448
Default

I don't envisage doing anything larger than 20x16, but it did cross my mind that when I printed 6x12 larger trays would be useful. With 24x20 trays I could print 20x10 with a border, I did wonder if this would be large enough for exhibition, if I wanted large panoramas, so I got 3 trays which were approx 1.2m by 0.9m, which sounds the same size as the Silverprint ones you mention. Only problem is they are so big, I can barely fit them in the darkroom hence they are totally impractical in my darkroom (I didn't really think through how big an area they take up side by side) so it looks like I will have to stick to 24x20.

I have still got the large trays, as I was thinking that I could just about use them in my darkroom if I wanted, but the more I think about it the more I think it would be disastrous, I barely have room to move between the benches! and I can foresee chemical spills on a large scale


Neil
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15th September 2010, 06:45 AM
Dave miller Dave miller is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,322
Default

First off Akyiia we only delete threads that contravene our few rules.

I don't normally print above 12"x16" but when I need to I have a processing drum that will accept up to 20"x24".

I used to have a set of very large trays, which were very difficult to handle when full. One reason that they are so expensive is that they are made from very thick material.

We have discussed the problem of processing very large prints without trays on this forum so a search may be of help to you.
__________________
Regards
Dave
www.davids.org.uk
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15th September 2010, 07:31 AM
Richard Gould Richard Gould is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jersey Channel Islands
Posts: 5,126
Default

Size is a personal choice, for myself I like smaller sizes, and I tend to print 9.5 by 12, I like the size and I like the idea that when my photographs are hanging people have to come close to look at them, and perhaps get drawn into the print, you will get much advice, but mine is to decide what you like, size is'nt everything,sometimes a smaller print beats a bigger one,Richard
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15th September 2010, 07:35 AM
Trevor Crone's Avatar
Trevor Crone Trevor Crone is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,609
Default

So far I've never printed larger than 16"x20" - the added problems of large mounts, frames and storage, have been issues for me that have turned me away from doing big prints. I now rarely make enlargements bigger than 12"x16".

My photography these days is more towards making contact prints (4x5 to 8x10) - I just really enjoy the intimacy of small prints.
__________________
"To the attentive eye, each moment of the year has its own beauty, and in the same field, it beholds, every hour, a picture which was never seen before, and which will never be seen again" Ralph Waldo Emerson.

Timespresent
Arenaphotographers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15th September 2010, 07:51 AM
mono's Avatar
mono mono is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 817
Default

I print my 35 mm negs up to 10 fold or not bigger than 24x36 cm and MF not bigger than 30x30 cm. That is the maximum size my positive scanner can handle. I have standardized on these formats.
Sorry about cm sizes, I will never get used to inch, feet ... I am too old for that stuff ;-)

And very good trays are the following ones which I have up to 50x60 cm photo size (they are bigger as you may see here: http://www.monochrom.com/cc/monoc/in.../210/de/96.pdf)

I like Trevorīs point of view of the intimacy of smaller prints, like Michael Kenna who makes small prints, too!
So I might reduce my print size in the near future...?
__________________
Folker

MonoArt

Last edited by mono; 15th September 2010 at 08:17 AM. Reason: Link added
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15th September 2010, 07:54 AM
Kev M Kev M is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 89
Default

I only print up to 16x12 but even that is a struggle with my equipment. I have an RRB 20x16 easel but the actual image area is only really around 16x12, the rest of the space is taken up by the blades of the easel so even if I stuck 20x16 paper in it there would be a minimum 2" border all around it.

The other problem I have is the size of the easel. The edge is so deep it butts up against the vertical post of the enlarger and pushes the printable area towards the centre of the base board making it difficult to fill a 16x12 area. Come to think of it, the widest picture I've managed so far is 14x11.

Either way, to print bigger would mean spending out on more gear and I've done more than enough of that lately. Out local competitions only accept images up to 16x12 anyway so I don't really have a reason to print any bigger than that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15th September 2010, 08:35 AM
Carl V's Avatar
Carl V Carl V is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northwich, Cheshire
Posts: 312
Default

I do have trays which can accommodate a 16 x 20 print, but I very rarely ever print at that size these days. My usual print size is 10 x 8 and 9.5 x 12, and occasionally 7 x 5.

A few years ago I was printing on 8.25 x 11.75 which I liked as it allowed me to print virtually the whole negative frame if this was required, but I usually find I want to crop out certain parts of the negative anyway.
__________________
Carl.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15th September 2010, 09:22 AM
Paulographic Paulographic is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mid Pennines
Posts: 775
Default

I don't print very large due to cost,storage, mounting/framing etc and also the cost to a potential buyer (when one comes along).
I now prefer smaller prints too.
But as my wet bench is just that, a bench with no drainage, I sit my dishes in larger ones to minimise spillage.
Some of the larger ones I picked up in my local garden centre.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15th September 2010, 12:24 PM
Mike O'Pray Mike O'Pray is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Daventry, Northants
Posts: 7,778
Default

10x8 max. If I ever want to go larger then like Dave I have a Jobo drum. If I became serious about larger than 10x8 on a regular basis then I'd bite the bullet and buy a 12x16 Nova. Unless you have a lot of space, even three 12x16 trays take up a lot of room.

Something I don't think anybody has mentioned is: If you think large trays are expensive, try large easels for the prints!!

Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free:   AG Photographic   Keyphoto   The Imaging Warehouse   Process Supplies   RH Designs   RK Photo   Second-hand Darkroom Supplies   Silverprint Ltd

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do digital, colour or black and white, prints sell better than darkroom prints. Mark Burley Business Matters 51 20th September 2013 02:47 PM
What size lens for medium format jonsparkes Darkroom 3 20th January 2010 10:30 PM
small 7x5 size prints Larry Art and aesthetics 9 19th January 2010 06:47 PM
What size tray? Andy Darkroom 5 15th December 2009 05:39 PM
Size matters? Trevor Crone Art and aesthetics 46 14th September 2009 08:25 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.