Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Anyone lith printing? |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Anyone lith printing?
I'm just getting back into doing some lith printing after a gap of a few years. I'm using Fotospeed Lith developer and I've got about 50 sheets of Kentona left, which i know liths well. I've also just been given (!) an unopened box of Kentmere Art Classic. My problem is that it won't last forever. What current papers work well for lith? I know some of the Foma papers are supposed to be good but which ones?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I've tried the new(ish) Adox MC110 and Ilford's Art 300 - Both produced worked OK, but I haven't used any of the recent batches.
With the papers that generally don't work with lith developers, most of them produce interesting results when overexposed, developed in a regular developer, bleached back, and redeveloped in a lith bath. Depending on the bleach used, the resulting colours can vary considerably. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I recently found a copy of Tim Rudmans book in a charity shop. It was one of the ones that specialise in books. Anyway, it has made me think about trying lith work. I hope to do so in the next few weeks.
Alex |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Rob,
I used to do quite a lot of Lith, and I found that several of the Foma fibre papers worked well in Fotospeed dev. However, a couple of years ago there were some emulsion changes that meant that some of the best papers didn't actually undergo infectious development properly - they produced "lithy" colours, but the normal lith controls for contrast and exposure didn't work. I believe that the emulsions have been changed again and do now lith properly, but I haven't had the chance to check. Some of the Slavich FB papers also lith, giving a really gritty look, which suits some negs well. The trick with these seems to be that they need washing *before* they go into the dev for proper infectious development to occur. However, the best source of information is Tim Rudman himself - I'd suggest subscribing to his mailing list (http://www.timrudman.com/mailing_list) and then you can download his latest summary of the available materials. Good luck! Andrew |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I envy you being the owner of a whole box of Art Classic. A friend gave me 2 sheets and I've not yet been brave enough to try it!
As has been said, Tim Rudman's mailing list is the best way to keep abreast of the comings and goings around suitable papers. I believe the Foma papers are back on track now. Alongside Fomatone, I have enjoyed playing with Nature. It's a bit more subtle than Fomatone, which can be quite orange. That said, lithed Fomatone split tones nicely with selenium and gold. If you don't already have one, I can recommend an RH Designs darkroom torch. They're invaluable for monitoring infectious development and deciding when to snatch the print. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
some people reported over the net that Foma papers are a bit "delicated" for lith printing - the same paper bur different lot number can make a difference. Tim Rudman's newsletter is a great resource to avoid this problem.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
HI Rob,
I've done a fair bit of lith work over the last few years, even attended one of Tim Rudman's excellent workshops. I've documented my experiences using various papers and processes on my site. Here's a link which pulls out all the chemical lith posts: http://real-photographs.co.uk/category/chem-lith/
__________________
Roy ------------ The Golden Fleece - Home of The Creative Camera Archive and Real Photographs and |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Well, I've tried the old paper I was given. The bad news is that it's too badly fogged for most 'ordinary' use. The good news is that it liths beautifully!
Since my original post the same guy has found a couple more boxes of paper - one of Kentona (original pre-Harman stuff) and one of Kentmere Bromide (G3). The Kentona is lightly fogged but, like the Art Classic, liths ok. I haven't had time to test the Bromide. Anyone here tried it in lith developer? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I do lith printing (much more than regular bw printing).
As for foma papers - FRESH batches of Fomatone MG Class 131 and 132 now lith very well and consistently even between batches, almost as good as the old ones and react well with the lith developer and any additives. You can confirm the batch numbers when buying against Tim Rudmans mailing list. One more good source of lith materials and knowledge is Wolfgang Moersch in Germany. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Rob,
I’ve been doing a bit of lith recently, printing on 30 year old Agfa Record Rapid developed in LD20. You are lucky with the Kentmere papers, Kentona is wonderful in lith, Bromide I’m not so sure about. I think it will be a bit subdued compared with the emulsion on Kentona. Good luck. |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lith printing blog | ivanbpalli | Members Announcements | 5 | 18th November 2014 12:08 PM |
MCC 110 lith printing | Niall Bell | Monochrome printing techniques | 16 | 5th March 2010 06:19 PM |
World of lith printing | Bob Smith | Alternate printing processes | 23 | 25th January 2010 10:50 PM |
Lith printing/Paraformaldehyde | vanannan | Alternate printing processes | 2 | 20th January 2010 10:16 PM |
Lith printing | PaulG | Monochrome printing techniques | 2 | 17th June 2009 03:02 PM |