Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Printing a B&W Negative on RA4 [paper |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
John, well done. What was your RA4 paper and what filtration did you use for neutral grey? Thanks
As Lostlabours says, it might be worthwhile trying for sepia as well. That gives the best of both worlds in the form of straight prints and "toned" prints without toning I have seen prints from B&W negs on RA4 produced by my local mini-lab and to most eyes I'd say that its prints would pass for trad B&W paper. Of course the lab does it by pushing a few buttons instead of the much more laborious "cut and try" methods we have to use in a darkroom but it does demonstrate that it can work Mike |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Uploading
Thanks for that.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Filtration
Quote:
I have now almost certainly abandoned Fuji paper, it is sometimes too difficult to get rid of cyan or green casts. I am now using Kodak (Cut from a roll) so the filtration will be different. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
A belated comment on the above. I said that I had given up on Fuji paper because of the casts that I could not get rid of. I had quite a large quantity so at the time was loath to throw it out. I started to use it again for enprints but it is absolutely awful.
It isn't all that old - less than 6 months but the cyan cast will not go away, it seems to be getting worse! A comparative 10x12 print on Fuji and one on Kodak shows the Fuji had a marked loss of colour colour saturation with an all over haze. The Kodak one was miles away the better. No point in keeping the Fuji so into the recycling bin it goes or to my grandchildren to draw on the back. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Commiserations, John. That does seem a very short time and to be fair to Fuji such a short time before it goes bad is not a criticism I had heard much of.
The only problem for most folk with Kodak is that only a site in Germany provide cut sheets Yes it can be cut at home with a bit of a "faff" but I have yet to have the courage to try and whereas a 100 sheet box for intermittent colour sessions is OK I wonder whether I'd have problems with the time I'd take to get through a whole roll Mike |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Cutting Kodak Paper
After the final decision to ditch the Fuji I set about cutting a quantity of the Kodak paper roll.
I think I posted a description of my roll holder a while back and using this I was able to cut 25 sheets of 12x16 in about 10 mins using a guilotine and a piece of 20x16 card marked out in various paper sizes. I chose to cut 12x16 only because it is simpler to do and the sheets can then be cut down to smaller sizes with little waste. I had my DUKA safelight on turned down to 10% but as the paper comes out of the holder face down it can be handled with relative ease. My main worry when making the paper holder was that the plywood may contain chemicals that could fog the paper, so far there has been no reaction. The 12" roll of glossy is 88M long and cost £84, however out of 88M I can cut approx 220 sheets (not allowing for waste, so it is a good deal cheaper than Fuji as well. |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Printing paper | PeterMcC | Photography in general | 1 | 8th September 2013 03:41 PM |
Printing a panaramic negative beyond the enlargers capability? | Gavin | Monochrome Film | 10 | 20th October 2012 08:00 AM |
Paper Negative Workshop | Bill | Workshop News | 4 | 14th April 2012 06:51 AM |
Printing a negative or positive image | cliveh | Monochrome printing techniques | 7 | 6th May 2011 07:56 PM |
Paper negs and printing through paper | wiesmier | Darkroom | 10 | 5th February 2009 08:21 AM |