Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> Storing exposed film (undeveloped) |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Storing exposed film (undeveloped)
I have a friend who is undertaking a long trip (6 months), and wants to shoot film. What is the longest time that a film can be stored after being exposed but undeveloped, without suffering any loss of image quality? And how should it be stored? Is a fridge OK? Or must it be in a freezer?
Do all B&W films have similar stability (or lack thereof)? I know that Pan-F is well known for needing development ASAP after being exposed, but what about HP5, Tri-X or Tmax-400? (which are the films being considered here). I don't have much insight into this, so thought I'd ask the group here. Any help greatly appreciated. Svend |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I think the thing to avoid is extreme temperature changes before and after exposure.
If he has access to a fridge, then i'd use it, but if not, keep it in a constant temperature and dark place. Another alternative may be to take equipment for processing with him? Pan-F is well known for being sensitive to storage.....i've suffered from it myself. Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I have successfully developed film beyond 6 months but have not tried to do Pan F after this length of period. Given that even the Ilford rep on a site now known as Photrio admitted that more than a few weeks after exposure and before development was "problematical" for Pan F, I'd be inclined to avoid its use if development had to wait 6 months
However like most things there will be users who had had no problem but it is not a chance I'd want to take if the Pan F stuff was of scenes that might be difficult or impossible to re-take Mike |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Just to be clear, Pan-F is not one of his preferred choices here. He is looking at either HP5, Tri-X or Tmax-400. He is leaning toward the Tmax for it's finer grain, but I know nothing about longer storage of exposed TMY and whether it is problematic. I am guessing he'd be OK with Tri-X or HP5, if kept refrigerated, but again I have limited experience here. Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Svend, Pan F won't last more than a day or 2 without the undeveloped latent image going bad, I can tell you that from personal experiane, I developed a roll of Pan F after a week and virtualy nothing on the film, also developed some HP5+ and FP4+ after the taken at the same time, and no problem, I have developed HP5/tri X after a month or 2 and fine, same goes for Fomapan, latent image keeps well, as far as storing film, personally I don't keep any of mine, either exposed or unexposed in a fridge, I mostly keep exposed film in my darkroom until I develop it with no problem, and un exposed film on a shelf untill I need it again no problems, as you know I mainly use Fomapan these days, but the films latent image keeps well but I would not suggest Pan F unless it is developed within 48 hours, the rest should keep fine, judgeing from my own experiances
Richard
__________________
jerseyinblackandwhite.blogspot.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sounds good Richard.
Do you think 6 months would be OK, if kept refrigerated? Any insight as to how Tmax-400 responds to storage? Any different than, say, Tri-X? |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I would use an air tight container to store the film containers in. If he is going to be taking it in and out of fridges as it could attract condensation.
__________________
Mitch http://photomi7ch.blogspot.com/ If you eliminate the impossible whatever remains no matter how improbable must be the truth. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent point - will pass that along. Thanks Mitch.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Richard
__________________
jerseyinblackandwhite.blogspot.com |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Film is a bit tougher than many of us seem to give it credit for.
The only film which has ever given me trouble is PanF in 120. Never had an issue with HP5 even months after exposure. If I was going on a six month trip I would not be putting my film in and out of fridges or freezers. Even 135 in it's little tub has some moisture in the air surrounding it in the tub. I'm wary of repeated cycles of warming and cooling, with the possibility of condensation appearing then drying off. Also, how much film might I shoot in 6 months of touring? Enough to become a problem carrying it. Is your friend using 135 or 120? 135 will be easier on space. Personally, I'd keep 135 in the tub, avoid extreme temperatures, and if I had a sympathetic friend at home I'd post rolls home regularly to be safely stored. Is there a risk of loss- maybe, but how about lugging around 20 or 30 rolls, exposed to all sorts of changes in climate, and the risk of total loss if something catastrophic happened? ps- If you'e worried about posting precious film, just remember Kodachrome. How many hundreds of millions of rolls of that safely made it through the post? Last edited by skellum; 5th February 2019 at 07:41 PM. |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Storing processed film | LukeS | Equipment miscellaneous | 17 | 5th November 2016 06:06 PM |
storing B&W film | Jakecb | Monochrome Film | 16 | 27th July 2015 01:44 PM |
Old Exposed Film - ? | CambsIan | Photography in general | 25 | 28th September 2014 12:02 PM |
storing exposed 120 rolls | DaveUral | Top Tips | 7 | 23rd May 2012 05:47 PM |
Old film just exposed | photomi7ch | Monochrome Film | 19 | 6th November 2009 08:28 PM |