Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
> HELP 30+ enlarging lenses, which to keep? |
*** Click here for the FADU 2015/2014 Yearbooks *** |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
TTH Ental lens
Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
lenses
Quote:
The 50mm Apo Rodagon is probably the best in the list - I have one now. I don't rate Componon lenses they are too 'plasticky' for my liking (and only 5 element). The stop down lever on the side looks a bit too flimsy The Nikkor 50/2.8 are superb as well, but I prefer the older one with a metal barrel and mount, I have had both at one time and the early one out-performed the later one - no question. Is that likely to be down to the stability of the metal as opposed to the plastic? I also have a Durst 50/2.8 which is not listed in your attachment and it is almost as good as the Rodagon, but has a bit of colour fringing close to the edges with high contrast subjects. No problem with B&W of course. I have heard the Durst lenses were actually made by Pentax. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I'd have to be awfully bored to test out 30 enlarger lenses, which just won't happen in this lifetime.
So I would split them into 3 groups. 1. Highly rated Top Brand lenses. Ones you can be relatively certain will deliver good results. A matched set would be nice. 2. Those that you can sell (or give away) easily. These are the lenses that I'd want to part with. 3. Those too ugly to sell. I would also include rare in this category, even if they're beautiful. It's this group of lenses that I'd have fun experimenting with. If I didn't like the results I'd just throw them out or try them as a macro on my digital. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Deon |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I notice that you have two Leitz lenses on the list. I think these are the two special lenses for the Focomat IIc enlarger.
A Focomat IIc without these lenses will not function unless the owner is prepared to pay for a very expensive upgrade from Kienzle in Germany. Therefore anyone with a IIC that does not have these lenses would pay good money for them.I know this because I had to buy the 100mm lens for mine. Apart from that I agree that a good brand does not mean a good lens - but it is a start. I would test all for each required focal length and keep the best performers. Last edited by CharlesBinns; 8th December 2015 at 10:04 AM. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Apologies - should be http://www.kienzle-phototechnik.de/h...e_english.html for details on Focomat II lens conversions
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks everyone. I'll try a few lenses out and see if I can see any discernible differences just with the naked eye.
__________________
MartyNL “Reaching a creative state of mind thru positive action is considered preferable to waiting for inspiration.” - Minor White, 1950 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
When following a similar curve of wondering about enlarger lenses, I compared my rodagon and fujinon lenses, and found there to be no discernible differences for the sorts of sizes and f-stops that I typically enlarge at/with.
I also have a fair bit of overlap, and find that I use one lens 95% of the time (a Rodagon-WA 120/5.6). Stopped down to F8 this lens is lovely, and is perfect for all medium formats that I shoot, giving a large enough print for 645, and has a large enough image circle to cover 5*4. I use a rodagon 80/4 at times, but really, the 120 is the one for me! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Marty,
I just came across this older thread, and I'm curious to know if you did any testing? And if so, what did you find? On a much smaller scale I will be going through the same exercise. I find myself with four lenses, but really only need two -- one for 35mm and one for 120 (up to 6x9). I have the following: 1) Nikkor 50mm f4, older metal barrel, 4 element Tessar design (this is my original lens for 35mm) 2) Nikkor 50mm f4, newer plastic barrel, also 4 element Tessar The newer ones were said to have been redesigned and relabelled with the "N" designation, but that may have been only done to the 6-element 50mm/2.8...not sure on that. I will test both of mine to see which is better. If neither rank, then I will look for a 6-element 50mm replacement; I hear good things about the CE Rokkor. That said, I did some very nice 8x10's with my old 50mm/f4 Nikkor, but it didn't look so great when I pushed it to 11x14. 3) Nikkor 80mm F5.6N, newer plastic barrel, 6-element Supposed to be an excellent lens; came with a recent enlarger purchase. Might even serve for 35mm as I have a tall-column Beseler. If lucky, I might be able to squeak out an 11x14 on the baseboard. If not good for 35mm, and if no better for 6x6 than the Componon (below) then I will sell it. 4) Componon-S 100mm f5.6 This one is a keeper; I've used it for 6x6 and it's a gem. Coverage will work for my 6x9 negs. Should be a fun bit of testing. How did you fare with your trials? I notice from your list that you have the same Nikkors as I have, and a 100mm Componon, albeit a different version. Cheers, Svend Last edited by Svend; 23rd September 2016 at 06:11 PM. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry Svend, I've not got around to doing any testing...
The chance would be a fine thing!
__________________
MartyNL “Reaching a creative state of mind thru positive action is considered preferable to waiting for inspiration.” - Minor White, 1950 |
Support our Sponsors, they keep FADU free: AG Photographic The Imaging Warehouse Process Supplies RH Designs Second-hand Darkroom Supplies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: Schneider 60mm and 100mm enlarging lenses | Trond | Sale or Wanted | 0 | 6th August 2014 07:28 PM |
Enlarging lenses in stepless control position | MartyNL | Darkroom | 3 | 11th November 2012 12:45 PM |
Enlarging & Timing | vincent | Monochrome printing techniques | 18 | 27th October 2010 08:04 PM |
Resolving power of enlarging lenses | MartyNL | Darkroom | 14 | 15th September 2010 09:35 AM |
Enlarging Lenses. | Keith Tapscott. | Darkroom | 28 | 15th February 2010 02:12 PM |